AIST
Calendar
Foundation
Steel News
Search WWW
Login
Toggle navigation
About AIST
Membership
Local Member Chapters
Technology Committees
Conferences & Expositions
Industry Resources
Publications & Advertising
Students & Faculty
×
Store Home
Cart Summary
+ Show
- Hide
0 item(s) ($0.00)
Your cart is empty.
Open Invoices
×
Click the box next to each open invoice to add it to your cart.
Date
Invoice
Description
Balance
In Cart
×
Membership & Subscriptions
Join AIST
Renew My Membership
Print Journal Subscription
Digital Journal Subscription
Print & Digital Journal Subscription
Full Digital Subscription
Events
AISTech
All Events
Annual Events
Member Chapters
Technology Committees
Technology Training
Webinars
Product Search
All Products
AIST Transactions
Books
Conference Proceedings
Industry Data
Iron & Steel Technology
About the AIST Resource Center
Product Details:
Stirring Efficiency Generated by Electromagnetic Stirring vs. Bottom Gas Stirring for a Giant Electric Arc Furnace — Numerical Simulation Results
On the road to sustainable steelmaking, replacing the blast furnace route with the electric arc furnace (EAF) is considered one of the most viable solutions to achieving carbon-neutral steel production. The proposed charge mix in this kind of EAF will ideally be hydrogen-based direct reduced iron combined with scrap. The furnace capacity is normally in the range of 200•500 tons. Due to the high temperature gradient within the giant EAF bath and lack of CO bubbling in the melt, bottom stirring is highly appreciated from a metallurgical process perspective. The stirring efficiency generated by electromagnetic stirring (EMS) versus bottom gas stirring (BGS) has been investigated for a 450-ton-capacity EAF with the help of numerical simulations and some industrial performance test results. Melt flow pattern, velocity distribution, stirring energy and bath temperature homogenization have been compared directly for these two stirring technologies. Preliminary results show that the stirring power induced by EMS is several times higher than by BGS. The pros and cons of EMS versus BGS in terms of equipment installation, lifespan, operation safety and reliability issues will be discussed in this article.
Product:
2025/01 AIST Iron & Steel Technology January
Additional Product Info
Product Code:
PR-PM0125-3
Author:
Lidong Teng, Hongliang Yang, Monika Zielinska, Zaeim Mehraban
Date:
January 01, 2025
Format:
PDF
Member Price:
$25.00
Non-Member Price:
$35.00
Your Price:
$35.00
Available for Immediate Download
Item added to cart!
×
Item
Qty
Price
Subtotal
View Cart/Enter Coupon
Checkout
Your cart is empty.